home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
Turnbull China Bikeride
/
Turnbull China Bikeride - Disc 2.iso
/
BARNET
/
ARMLINUX
/
MAIL
/
9709
/
000017_owner-linux-arm…r.rutgers.edu _Fri Sep 12 16:38:22 1997.msg
< prev
next >
Wrap
Internet Message Format
|
1997-11-30
|
2KB
Return-Path: <owner-linux-arm-outgoing@vger.rutgers.edu>
Received: from nic.funet.fi (nic.funet.fi [128.214.248.6])
by odie.barnet.ac.uk (8.8.6/8.8.6) with ESMTP id QAA04017
for <willy@odie.fluff.org>; Fri, 12 Sep 1997 16:38:22 +0100
Received: from vger.rutgers.edu ([128.6.190.2] EHLO vger.rutgers.edu ident: root [port 27940]) by nic.funet.fi with ESMTP id <7178-19737>; Fri, 12 Sep 1997 18:36:48 +0300
Received: by vger.rutgers.edu id <972516-12608>; Thu, 11 Sep 1997 05:59:06 -0400
Received: from snowcrash.cymru.net ([163.164.160.3] EHLO snowcrash.cymru.net ident: IDENT-NOT-QUERIED [port 1407]) by vger.rutgers.edu with ESMTP id <972121-12608>; Thu, 11 Sep 1997 05:20:00 -0400
Received: (from alan@localhost) by snowcrash.cymru.net (8.8.5-q-beta3/8.7.1) id JAA29609; Thu, 11 Sep 1997 09:37:22 +0100
From: Alan Cox <alan@cymru.net>
Message-Id: <199709110837.JAA29609@snowcrash.cymru.net>
Subject: Re: Compiling kernel with non-gcc tool (ARM SDT 2.1)
To: olof.backing@netinsight.se (Olof Backing)
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 1997 09:37:18 +0100 (BST)
Cc: linux-arm@vger.rutgers.edu
In-Reply-To: <3.0.3.32.19970910165534.00911880@ernst> from "Olof Backing" at Sep 10, 97 04:55:34 pm
Content-Type: text
X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-arm@vger.rutgers.edu
Sender: owner-linux-arm@vger.rutgers.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO
> The reason why I'm asking is that I have heard that there's a lot of
> heavily dependant in-line stuff for gcc in the kernel sources.
Yep there is a lot of gcc dependant extension use, embedded assembly code
and other more subtle things - the code is optimised in general to make best
use of the way gcc generates code.
Alan